Skip to main content

Web Content Display Web Content Display

Peer-reviewed journal papers

  • ​Jastrzębski, J., Kroczek, B., & Chuderski, A. (2021). Galton and Spearman revisited: Can single general  discrimination ability drive performance on diverse sensorimotor tasks and explain intelligence? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, doi.org/10.1037/xge0001005. 
  • Chuderski, A., Jastrzębski, J., & Kucwaj, H. (2021). How physical interaction with insight problems affects solution rates, hint use, and cognitive load. British Journal of Psychology, DOI:10.1111/bjop.12442 
  • Chuderski, A., Jastrzębski, J., Kroczek, B., Kucwaj, H., & Ociepka, M. (2021). Metacognitive experience on Raven’s matrices versus insight problems. Metacognition & Learning, DOI: 10.1007/s11409-020-09236-6 
  • Jastrzębski, J., Ociepka, M., & Chuderski, A. (2020). Fluid intelligence is equivalent to relation processing. Intelligence, 82, 101-489. 
  • Kałamała, P., Ociepka, M., & Chuderski, A. (2020). ERP evidence for rapid within-trial adaptation of cognitive control during conflict resolution. Cortex, 131, 151-163. 
  • Dreszer, J., Grochowski, M., Lewandowska, M., Nikadon, J., Gorgol, J., Bałaj, B., Finc, K., Duch, W., Kałamała, P., Chuderski, A., & Piotrowski, T. (2020). Spatiotemporal complexity patterns of resting-state bioelectrical activity explain fluid intelligence: Sex matters. Human Brain Mapping, 41, 4846-4865. 
  • Kałamała, P., Szewczyk, J., Chuderski, A., Senderecka, M., & Wodniecka, Z. (2020). Patterns of bilingual language use and response inhibition: A test of the adaptive control hypothesis. Cognition, 204, 104373.   
  • Drążyk, D., Kumka, M., Zarzycka, K., Zguda, P., & Chuderski, A. (2020). No indication that the ego depletion manipulation can affect insight: a comment on DeCaro and VanStockum (2018). Thinking & Reasoning, 26, 414-446.  
  • Skrzypulec, B., & Chuderski, A. (2020). Nonlinear effects of spatial connectedness implicate hierarchically structured representations in visual working memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 113, 104124.
  • Kucwaj, H., & Chuderski, A. (2020). Susceptibility to distraction during analogical reasoning in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research: Cognition, 20, 100170.
  • Chuderski, A. (2019). Even a single trivial binding of information is critical for fluid intelligence. Intelligence, 77, 101396. 
  • Smoleń, T., & Chuderski, A. (2019). Semantic conflict mobilizes self-control in a realistic task. Current Psychology, 38, 134-144.
  • Chuderski, A., & Jastrzębski, J. (2018). No role of initial problem representation in insight problem solving. Creativity Research Journal, 30, 428-438.
  • Smoleń, T., Jastrzębski, J., Estrada, E., & Chuderski, A. (2018). Most evidence for the compensation account of cognitive training is unreliable. Memory & Cognition, 46, 1315-1330.    
  • Jastrzębski, J., Ciechanowska, I., & Chuderski, A. (2018). The strong link between working memory capacity and fluid intelligence cannot be explained away by strategy use. Intelligence, 66, 44-53.
  • Gągol, A., Magnuski, M., Kroczek, B., Kałamała, P., Ociepka, M., Santarnecchi, E., & Chuderski, A. (2018). Delta phase modulation of gamma neuronal oscillations explains fluid intelligence. Intelligence, 66, 54-63.
  • Chuderski, A. & Jastrzębski, J. (2018). Much ado about Aha! Insight problem solving is strongly related to working memory capacity and reasoning ability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 147, 257-281.
  • Chuderski, A. & Jastrzębski, J. (2017). Working memory facilitates insight instead of hindering it: A comment on DeCaro et al. (2016). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 43, 1993-2004.
  • Kałamała, P., Sadowska, A., Ordziniak, W., & Chuderski, A. (2017). Gestalt effects in visual working memory: Whole-part similarity works, symmetry does not. Experimental Psychology, 64, 5-13.
  • Chuderski A. (2016). Fluid intelligence and the cross-frequency coupling of neuronal oscillations. Spanish Journal of Psychology, 19, E91.
  • Chuderski, A., Senderecka, M., Kałamała, P., Kroczek, B., & Ociepka, M. (2016). ERP correlates of the conflict level in the multi-response Stroop task. Brain Research, 1650, 93-102.
  • Chuderski, A. (2016). Time pressure prevents relational learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 49, 361-365.
  • Colom, R., Chuderski, A., & Santarnecchi E. (2016). Bridge over troubled water: Commenting the Process Overlap Theory. Psychological Inquiry, 27, 181-189.
  • Chuderski, A., & Smoleń, T. (2016). An integrated model of utility-based evaluation and resolution of conflicts in the Stroop task. Psychological Review, 123, 255-290.
  • Kroczek, B., Ociepka, M., & Chuderski, A. (2016). No Spearman’s Law of Diminishing Returns for the working memory and intelligence relationship. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 47, 83-90.
  • Smoleń, T. & Chuderski, A. (2015). The quadratic relationship between difficulty of intelligence test items and their correlations with working memory. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, Article 1270.
  • Chuderski, A. (2015). The broad factor of working memory is virtually isomorphic to fluid intelligence tested under time pressure. Personality and Individual Differences, 85, 98-104.
  • Chuderski, A., & Andrelczyk, K. (2015). From neural oscillations to complex cognition: Simulating the effect of the theta-to-gamma cycle length ratio on analogical reasoning. Cognitive Psychology, 76, 78-102.
  • Chuderski, A. (2015). Why people fail on the fluid intelligence tests. Journal of Individual Differences, 36, 138-149.
  • Chuderski, A. (2015). High intelligence prevents the negative impact of anxiety on working memory. Cognition & Emotion, 29, 1197-1209.
  • Chuderski, A. (2014). How well can storage capacity, executive control, and fluid reasoning explain insight problem solving. Intelligence, 46, 258-270.
  • Chuderski, A. (2014). Which working memory components predict intelligence: The roles of attention control and active buffer capacity. Psychology, 5, 328-339.
  • Chuderski, A., Smolen, T., & Taraday, M. (2014). Neither a response nor stimulus set-size effect in the manual Stroop task. Studia Psychologica, 56, 21-35.
  • Chuderska, A., & Chuderski, A. (2014). Two facets of cognitive control in analogical mapping: The role of semantic interference resolution and goal-driven structure selection. Thinking & Reasoning, 20, 352-371.
  • Chuderski, A. (2014). The relational integration task explains fluid reasoning above and beyond other working memory tasks. Memory & Cognition, 42, 448-463.
  • Chuderski, A. (2013). When are fluid intelligence and working memory isomorphic and when are they not? Intelligence, 41, 244-262.
  • Chuderski, A., Andrelczyk, K., & Smoleń, T. (2013). An oscillatory model of individual differences in working memory capacity and relational integration. Cognitive Systems Research, 24, 87-95.
  • Chuderski, A., & Stettner, Z. (2013). Testing the dual-component account of working memory with a serial recognition task. Frontiers in Psychological and Behavioral Science, 2, 10-16.
  • Chuderski, A., & Nęcka, E. (2012). The contribution of working memory to fluid intelligence: Capacity, control, or both? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38, 1689-1710.
  • Chuderski, A., Taraday, M., Nęcka, E., & Smoleń, T. (2012). Storage capacity explains fluid intelligence but executive control does not. Intelligence, 40, 278-295.
  • Chuderski, A., Stettner, Z., & Orzechowski, J. (2007). Computational modeling of individual differences in short term memory search. Cognitive Systems Research, 8, 161-173.